|
|
thOke: Hm ... this may be a little like nitpicking, but doesn't this AuxFeedbackLoop work - in both cases ?!?! |
2003-04-01 |
|
|
XionD: Dude...Aux repeater doesnt handle this well either it seems (not on my machine). Ive talked to HD and he's checkin the issues I presented. Thank god cause I SOOOOOOOOOOO want this machine to work on my PC. |
2003-04-01 |
|
|
rymix: ThOke: the difference is that the normal Auxbus wasn't designed to do feedback loops =) There is always a chance that BuzZ will trigger the Receiving machine before it triggers the Sending machine. Auxbus doesn't handle this (try it you'll see) |
2003-03-31 |
|
|
XionD: Ive tried everything and can get it to work for like 15 seconds then it crashes - mostly though when I start a blank tune, load it then connect it I get an error msg (wich is progress from loading the example.bmx's I spose). Was this beta tested HD cause usually ya machines work a charm :( |
2003-03-30 |
|
|
XionD: Oops sorry - I can Load the machine...if I try to use it though BUZZ HATES IT. |
2003-03-30 |
|
|
XionD: Anyone tried loading the examples??? I open one of the examples (#1) and buzz locks. I open #2 and get a wicked feedback loop and buzz closes, no warning or error msg - just closes. Odd indeed. |
2003-03-30 |
|
|
thOke: Well .. i still don't get it. What's the difference to using a 'normal' delay (with AuxReturn of course for a feedback loop) |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
rymix: This is the same idea I submitted to Fuzzpilz. It's quite simple: All it does (I'm assuming) is allow you to do feedback manually, therefore in the feedback loop you can insert any effect you want. If it calculates things correctly, there should be an minimum delay of 256 samples but not an additional delay of 256 samples. |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
davide: Very cool!
thoke: it's about auxsend feedback through effects what makes the difference (am i right?) something like what unwieldy delay 3 does |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
flos: I'm sure this is another great machine by the best buzz coder! |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
thOke: Uhh ?? Why does it sound different to just doing it with a 'normal' delay ? Does it relate to the 'NumSamples' attribute setting ? A little confused ... :) |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
mute: Nice, great accompaniment for ld's auxsend. |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
hamsteralliance: Heheh - neato. =P |
2003-03-28 |
|
|
IntrospectiveJourneys: Um, ok, I still don't get it... maybe tomorrow I'll understand. |
2003-03-28 |
