|
|
patchworkcat: Thanks again 2ndProcess, that random effect does something that would take all week otherwise ;) Nice little mixer too- the width is a sly little addition.
Cangel-Two machine setups at different BPM/tpb? Why, open two Buzzes of course! (I guess keeping the CPU consumption down -for things that really DO eat it up- is part of what Buzz is about!)
Cheers
>^.^< |
2001-11-13 |
|
|
kwoOk: Yeah! Good jobs Harc and 2ndProcess - i really like the look of this new mixer. Nice and simple and next to no CPU usage too. |
2001-11-13 |
|
|
JoaCHIP: Harcs Signal Analyser: Nice idea, and nice implementation, but I think the important area from -6 dB to 0 dB is way too small. A linear scale instead of the current logaritmic one, and variable horizontal speed would be really cool options. |
2001-11-12 |
|
|
Sylvia: Cangel...why do you want to do that? There are so many options to make different 'time-feelings' using the same BPM/TPB. (And you can do it right now with samples playing in a different time than Buzz's BPM.) |
2001-11-12 |
|
|
cangel: IGroove Nice hack but it's a pity that it can't be used as an additive to the master in Buzz. Its been a dream of mine that I could use buzz in a fashion to compose certain patterns in one BPM/TPB using one machine setup while using
a different machine setup at a different BPM/TPB at the same time. I know that this would probably eat up a lot of CPU usage especially on a PII 400 MHz system and especially the way Buzz is setup but it would still be cool if it were possible to do so. keep on grooving 2ndprogress your efforts are not unappreciated |
2001-11-12 |
